Category Archives: on Academics

it is not through

a complete lack of motivation that i write this at this indecent hour (3:18 am), but frustration. I have been awake for far too long, the evidence being that my head is beginning to hurt. I consider that to be a rather vital piece of evidence that I should take care of myself and sleep. The paper is not going to be finished tonight.

Kierkegaard and Camus can be such dreary existentialists to write about. Here are two philosophers, one who attempted to transcend the mundane activities of a mortal world into the promises of eternal heaven with a warped view of Christianity, and another who merely comments on the absurdity of living. Camus comments that life is not about trying to understand existence, but to accept it. He says that the big question is not about the meaning behind living, but to ask oneself whether life is really worth living or not. It’s rather dreary and dreadful. One considers himself to look like a kangaroo. The other goes on for ages about suicide and somehow interprets the myth of Sisyphus into a happy event. The birds are chirping. Existentialists are whiny enough. I’m not about to complain any longer.

I think it’s time to sleep on it tonight. Maybe I’ll talk about French politics next time, but I promise…it won’t be an essay by any stretch of the imagination. I have to read up on French government first, and that may take awhile, though most of my packing is already accounted for. If someone wants to write my Aristotle essay on psychological temperance and the “death by broken heart” phenomena as a result of emotional excesses (i.e. loneliness, grief etc.) then be my guest.

On Mother’s Day: Happy belated Mother’s Day to any moms who may be reading this blog. I regret that I was unable to see my mother for this annual occasion, but she was able to visit this past Saturday. My family and I had a decent time (minus the minor counts of bickering). We ate lunch at a local diner, played table tennis, and they helped move some of my packed belongings back home. The walls look bare, but clean. With every end, a fresh start awaits. I wonder what will be in store for me this summer. My boss has to call back first to reassure me that I still have my waitressing summer job (the tips there are excellent on busy days for such a small place).

P.S. I was interviewed for several RA positions that have recently become available. This was several weeks ago. I’ll let you know if anything exciting happens.  I have also begun messing around with Windows Movie Maker 2, although it has also become an annoyance to contend with. I am thinking about purchasing a Mac after the new operating system comes out, but my funds are low and as my responsible boyfriend keeps reminding me, I will have a heap of loans to pay off in another two years (I am currently about $25,000 in debt without interest) along with procuring a car (my sister totaled our shared one), but that is the price one pays for an undergraduate degree these days. I would not trade my experiences at this college though. It was a wise choice to matriculate here.

back from a momentary hiatus

I never let go, dear readers, I simply vanished for awhile. Many great academic lectures have been had since the time I visited with you last, and I am compelled to discuss two essays I had to read. There was Lorenz with On Aggression and Girard’s Mimesis and Violence. If you couldn’t tell already, I am taking a course on non-violence. Now, now, it is not a yuppie course, with tree-hugging, pot-smoking, flowerchildren wandering all over the globe singing and strumming guitars, it is a true class that has sought to understand whether violence is innate in human beings, or if this “tendency” is a deeper social consequence.

Lorenz says that this violence is innate. His major argument is that there are four points of militarianism within governments and nations that help to stir up this aggression within us :

1. An affront to the people (i.e. a terrorist bombing a building, killing many innocent lives, and the news of this horrible act is delivered to the people)

2. A leader that can unite the people under a cause of justice or revenge (i.e. a president, prime minister).

3. Give the enemy a face (i.e. Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein)

4. Have followers of the leader who are united in retaliating against the enemy

Now, Girard says that we are not like animals, and that violence is due to having no religious, ritualistic way to purge ourselves of built up aggression. He states that in primitive societies, there was a victim who was chosen to be the sacrifice to a god, and through these occasional killings, people vented their frustrations and anger with life. The scapegoat effect is more intricate in that the people actually believe the chosen victim is causing whatever problem that is plaguing their lives (the crops aren’t growing, there hasn’t been any rain, the economy is doing poorly), while the victim is actually innocent. Also, he claims that mimesis, or the process of humans being violent due to a scarcity of goods by wanting what someone else has, and acting violently toward that individual in order to claim his possession, is what causes violence among humans. He says that animal hierachies do not change when resources are scarce in the animal kingdom, whereas humans are willing to step outside of their allotted social roles in order to survive.

I may have done a poor job in fully explaining their theories in such short space, but I want you to decide who has the stronger argument. I have to write an essay on exactly that thesis, and am interested to know what your opinions are on the matter.

paranoia

It’s a long weekend with no classes until Tuesday, so this college girl has time to unwind, right? Wrong.

I have three 10-page papers to write. Two midterms to study for while the school decided to shut down the library for the weekend, and it seems everyone I care about on campus is leaving me for home (except for my lovely roommate and her best friend). All that aside, I found out three pieces of bad news yesterday:

1. my aunt’s mother, who is very close to the family, has incurable cancer in the last stage. the doctors cannot do anything for her.

2. my uncle was just diagnosed with testicular cancer, and had surgery. he’s home now, but I mean, c’mon, nobody told me until AFTER he was home.

3. my sister has to go to court for speeding and driving with too many passengers in her car. she’s so wild.

I just love this, but things happen and we will overcome. It is also my 3 year and 2 monthlyversary. That cheers me up, along with it being 9 days until my 20th birthday. This day can be salvaged! It can! :)

dead bees and the dirty school

the statistics professor was nearly in tears as she told us how our cooperative program with another college was being demolished. this affects my major of choice greatly, as half of the faculty teaches at the other school, specializes in different concentrations, holds the actual department offices, and offers courses required that are not offered here. in fact, that particular professor belongs to the other college, and so she will get whisked away by the end of the year or next, along with her title of being a dual-Chair of the Department.

It leaves me wondering several things:

1) Will my college compensate for the missing courses/professors by hiring new ones and assembling new courses to take its place?

2)  Will my major requirements be altered, and will those alterations result in any previously earned credits being disregarded and counted as electives?

3) Will tuition increase?

I hope 1. is answered with YES!

I hope 2. and 3. are answered with NO!

If 2 or 3 come back as Yes! then I will consider transferring elsewhere. They leave me no choice, and it’s not fair for them to do this to not only my major, but several others, with the idea of cancelling one major in its entirety.

As for dead bees, after coming back from class feeling horrible about all of this and concerned, there was a HUGE bee- we’re talking about an inch and a half in length and buzzing angrily at being caught up in the blinds. I heated up my grandmother’s homemade fried rice warily, as the microwave is situated underneath the window, and proceeded to evacuate the room as its buzzing became more agitated, and the blinds slightly rustled as it attempted to escape to kill whatever was making that awful noise (the microwave). so while I was standing in the hallway, looking into my room in a concerned and unsure manner, my neighbor across the hall, a pleasant freshman, offered to kill it. She lifted up the blinds without fear, took a tissuebox, and squished it against the window. She proceeded to smash a beetle that had been pissing the bee off directly after killing the first insect. She was even nice enough to take a tissue and wipe the bug guts off the window and deposit everything neatly into a waste receptacle. I looked on her online profile and one of her favorite quotes is: “Treat others as you would like to be treated.” There still are good people in the world, and even if good in this sense means taking the life of an angry insect or two, she is still great in my opinion and I’m very thankful that she stepped up to the plate when I struck out.

revising poetry

Some say that it is like all art- you have to derive inspiration and influence from the great masters above you before you can go out and create your own. Artists practice and perfect the basics, mastery of medium, and styles of others before finding their own voice. Musicians practice famous songs and only then do they go on to compose their own. I am having difficulty with a pretentious professor, yet wrote an e-mail expressing that I would like to try out these exercises he feels would improve my writing. It requires practicing the style of poets before me…my pride is in the way though. After so many years of being praised, being published in local and national contests, and being falsely accused of plagiarism, it is hard not to have an inflated ego.

The objective is to deflate it, crush it, and smash being humble into me. Do you think it’ll work?